Abstract

Objective: The patients with congenital hearing loss can diagnosed and treated early with newborn hearing screening programs. The aim of this study was the evaluation of the newborn hearing screening outcomes at Muğla Education and Research Hospital and to compare the results with recent literature.

Material and Methods: Infants who underwent hearing screening between January 2011 and December 2015 at Muğla Education and Research Hospital were included in the study. The newborns, with no risk factors, were screened using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). The newborns who failed the first screening were tested again after one week with the TEOAE. The infants who failed the test twice and were under high risk were screened using Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR). If the infants failed to pass ABR screening they were referred to tertiary health center. results: A total of 6724 babies were tested in five years. There were 16 patients in 2011, 15 patients in 2012, 10 patients in 2013, 8 patients in 2014, and 14 patients in 2015 for a total of 63 (0.93%) patients referred to a tertiary center with a preliminary diagnosis of hearing loss. Seventeen patients (0.25%) were diagnosed with permanent hearing loss. Fifteen patients (0.22%) had bilateral and two (0.02%) had unilateral hearing loss.conclusion: Early diagnosis and rehabilitation of congenital hearing loss positively affects the language development and cognitive functions of the individuals. Therefore, it is very important to put effective hearing screening programs into practice. Testing with the combination of TEOAE and ABR reduce unnecessary referrals to the tertiary hearing center. ABR test is more useful than TEOAE in high-risk groups

Keywords: Hearing loss, Otoacoustic emission, Auditory brainstem response

References

  1. Kennedy CR, McCann DC, Campbell MJ, Law CM, Mullee M, Petrou S, et al. Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2131-41.
  2. Hahn M, Lamprecht-Dinnesen A, Heinecke A, Hartmann S, Bulbul S, Schroder G, et al. Hearing screening in healthy newborns: Feasibility of different methods with regard to test time. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999;51:83-9.
  3. Magnani C, Bacchi G, Borghini AM, Delmonte D, Fava G, Occasio AM, et al. Universal newborn hearing screening: The experience of the University Hospital of Parma. Acta Biomed 2015;86:273-7.
  4. Thompson DC, Mc Phillips H, Davis RL, Lieu TL, Homer CJ, Helfand M. Universal newborn hearing screening: Summary of evidence. JAMA 2001;286:2000-10.
  5. Year 2000 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies. Pediatrics 2000;106:798-817.
  6. Thornton AR, Kimm L, Kennedy CR. Methodological factors involved in neonatal screening using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response testing. Hear Res 2003;182:65-76.
  7. Celik IH, Canpolat FE, Demirel G, Eras Z, Sungur VG, Sarier B, et al. Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Education and Research Hospital newborn hearing screening results and assessment of the patients. Turk Pediatri Ars 2014;49:138-41.

How to cite

1.
Köseoğlu S, Derin S, Bozkurt S, Şahan M, Üçüncü H. Newborn Hearing Screening Outcomes at Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Education and Research Hospital. Turk J Pediatr Dis [Internet]. 2017 Apr. 1 [cited 2025 May 24];11(1):5-8. Available from: https://turkjpediatrdis.org/article/view/469