Abstract

Allergic contact dermatitis is a delayed type (Type 4) hypersensitivity reaction that occurs after recurrence of previously encountered and sensitizing substances. Although adults have the most occupational exposure, hobbies, toys and sports equipment may also be associated with this clinical picture in children. The patch test is the gold standard to detect the allergy and make a definite diagnosis.A 13-year-old male patient presented to our clinic with pruritic lesions on both hands and feet for the last two months. The history revealed that he had been involved in two months of intense sports, using goalkeeper’s gloves while playing soccer and rubber slippers for swimming.The patient was primarily considered to have contact dermatitis . A patch test was performed with the European standard series for differential diagnosis. Mercaptobenzothiazole and mercapto mix were evaluated as positive.We would like to emphasize through this case that sports activities, toys, and hobbies should be questioned for possible contact allergen in the diagnosis of dermatitis in childhood, and we intended to highlight the importance of the patch test in the diagnosis

Keywords: Allergic contact dermatitis, Children, Patch test

References

  1. Kadyk DI, McCarter K, Achen F, Belsito DV. Quality of life in patients with allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49:1037-48.
  2. Admani S, Jacob SE. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: Review of the past decade. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2014;14: 421
  3. Adisen E, Onder M, Terzioglu Y. A retrospective study of patients with facial allergic contact dermatitis patch tested with the European standard series in Turkey. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009;23:704-5.
  4. Adams AK, Warshaw EM. Allergic contact dermatitis from mercapto compounds. Dermatitis 2016;17:56-70.
  5. Clayton TH, Wilkinson SM, Rawcliffe C, Pollock B, Clark SM. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: Should pattern of dermatitis determine referral? A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 1995 and 2004 in one U.K. centre. Br J Dermatol 2006;154:114-7.
  6. Onder M, Adisen E. Patch test results in a Turkish paediatric population. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58:63-5.
  7. Ertam I, Turkmen M, Alper S. Patch-test results of an academic department in Izmir, Turkey. Dermatitis 2008;19:213-5.
  8. Diepgen TL, Bruynzeel DP, Andersen KE, Brandão FM, Bruze M, Gonçalo M. Mercaptobenzothiazole or the mercapto-mix: Which should be in the standard series? Contact dermatitis 2006;55:36- 8.
  9. Warshaw EM, Raju SI, Mathias CG, Dekoven JG, Belsito DV, Maibaxh HI. Concomitant patch test reactions to mercapto mix and mercaptobenzothiazole: Retrospective analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2008. Dermatitis 2013; 24: 321-7.
  10. Dou X, Zhao Y, Ni C, Zhu X, Liu L. Prevalence of contact allergy at a dermatology clinic in China from 1990-2009. Dermatitis 2011; 22:324-31.
  11. Onten AT, Baumstark J, Belloni B, Ring J, Schnopp C. Atypical diaper dermatitis: Contact allergy to mercapto compounds. Pediatric Dermatology 2011; 28:739-41.
  12. Tomc C, Kwasniak L, Shoureshi P, Nedorost S. Allergic contact dermatitis probably caused by mercaptobenzothiazole in thermal undergarments. Contact Dermatitis 2012;66:294-5.

How to cite

1.
Emeksiz ZŞ, Bostancı İ, Öztürk K. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in an Adolescent Athlete: Mercaptobenzothiazole and Mercapto Mix. Turk J Pediatr Dis [Internet]. 2018 Aug. 1 [cited 2025 May 25];12(2):139-41. Available from: https://turkjpediatrdis.org/article/view/530