Abstract

Objective: A number of illness severity scores have been established to predict mortality and morbidity in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The objective of this study was to compare SNAPPE-II (Scores for Neonatal Acute Physiology- Perinatal Extension-II) and CRIB- II (Clinical Risk Index for Babies-II), the latest versions of European and American scoring systems, in predicting hospital mortality and overall morbidity of surviving infants.

Material and Methods: Very low birthweight infants (VLBW) admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit were identified. CRIB-II and SNAP-PE-II scores were electronically calculated for each patient via the website www.sfar.org. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to check the accuracy of the mortality and morbidity prediction. results: A total of 189 VLBW neonates (mean CRIB-II:9.9±3.8; mean SNAP-PE-II: 45.8±25.4) were evaluated. The mean birth weight, gestational age, CRIB-II, SNAP-PE-II scores were associated with mortality. Both CRIB-II and SNAPPE-II were determined to be discriminatory for mortality, but not predictive enough for morbidity when evaluated with ROC curve analysis.conclusion: Both CRIB-II and SNAP-PE-II were found to be eligible in predicting hospital mortality of VLBW patients whereas their value was poor in predicting morbidity. CRIB-II, due to fewer parameters to evaluate, may be the preferred scoring system to predict mortality in NICUs with high patient capacity

Keywords: Morbidity, Mortality, Newborn, Risk assessment

References

  1. Harsha SS, Archana BR. SNAPPE-II (Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal Extension-II) in predicting mortality and morbidity in NICU. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:SC10-2.
  2. Ezz-Eldin ZM, Hamid TA, Youssef MR, Nabil Hel D. Clinical risk Index for Babies (CRIB II) Scoring System in Prediction of Mortality in Premature Babies. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:SC08-11.
  3. Richardson DK, Gray JE, McCormick MC, Workman K, Goldmann DA. Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology: A physiologic severity index for neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics 1993;91:617-23.
  4. Richardson DK, Phibbs CS, Gray JE, McCormick MC, Workman-Daniels K, Goldmann DA. Birth weight and illness severity: Independent predictors of neonatal mortality. Pediatrics 1993;91:969-75.
  5. The CRIB (Clinical Risk Index for Babies) Score: A tool for assessing initial neonatal risk and comparing performance of neonatal intensive care units. The International Neonatal Network. Lancet 1993;342:193-8.
  6. Pollack MM, Koch MA, Bartel DA, Rapoport I, Dhanireddy R, El-Mohandes AA, et al. A comparison of neonatal mortality risk prediction models in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2000;105:1051-7.
  7. Escobar GJ, Fischer A, Li DK, Kremers R, Armstrong MA. Score for neonatal acute physiology: Validation in three Kaiser Permanente neonatal intensive care units. Pediatrics 1995;96:918-22.
  8. Baumer JH, Wright D, Mill T. Illness severity measured by CRIB score: A product of changes in perinatal care? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997;77:F211-5.
  9. Petridou E, Richardson DK, Dessypris N, Malamitsi-Puchner A, Mantagos S, Nicolopoulos D, et al. Outcome prediction in Greek neonatal intensive care units using a score for neonatal acute physiology (SNAP). Pediatrics 1998;101:1037-44.
  10. Fowlie PW, Gould CR, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Strang D. Measurement properties of the Clinical Risk Index for Babies-reliability, validity beyond the first 12 hours, and responsiveness over 7 days. Crit Care Med 1998;26:163-8.
  11. Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJ, Lee SK. SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: Simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores. J Pediatr 2001;138: 92-100.
  12. Parry G, Tucker J, Tarnow-Mordi W. CRIB II: An update of the clinical risk index for babies score. Lancet 2003;361:1789-91.

How to cite

1.
Karaarslan U, Bag Ö, Özer EA, Helvacı M. Comparison of CrIb-II and Snap-Pe-II Scoring Systems in Predicting the Mortality and Morbidity of Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Turk J Pediatr Dis [Internet]. 2017 Aug. 1 [cited 2025 May 25];11(3):183-7. Available from: https://turkjpediatrdis.org/article/view/443