Abstract

Objective: It is important to detect the visual problems at its earliest period, in order to improve the quality of life of newborns. This study aimed to determine the refractive status of healthy term Turkish babies and to investigate whether there is a correlation between refractive status and birth weight.

Material and Methods: Two hundred and three healthy full-term babies at an age of postnatal 8 weeks were included in the study. In order to evaluate refractive status, handheld autorefractometer device was used in all subjects. The types of refractive errors were analyzed both in right and left eyes separately. Measurements taken under cycloplegic condition were analyzed for spherical equivalent, astigmatism and anisometropia.

Results: Hypermetropia was found as the most common refractive error among the participants (65% in right eyes, 62% in left eyes). With the rule astigmatism is found to be the most common astigmatic pattern in both eyes (75% in right eyes, 70% in left eyes). Anisometropia incidence was found to be 8%. No correlation between refractive status and birth weight was detected (p=0.105 r=-0.280).

Conclusion: Our outcomes provide a cross-sectional refractive data of a group of term Turkish infants and show that the hypermetropia is the most common refractive error. We did not detect a correlation between refractive error and birth weight, birth height, and gestational age. Therefore, all infants regardless of the gestational age and other parameters should be screened for refractive errors.

Keywords: Astigmatism, Birth Weight, Gestational age, Hypermetropia, Refractive error

References

  1. Atkinson J, Braddick O, Robier B, Anker S, Ehrlich D, King J, Watson P, Moore A. Two infant vision screening programmes: prediction and prevention of strabismus and amblyopia from photo- and videorefractive screening. Eye (Lond) 1996;10:189-98.
  2. Saunders KJ, McCulloch DL, Shepherd AJ, Wilkinson AG. Emmetropisation Following Preterm Birth. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86:1035-40.
  3. Büchner TF1, Schnorbus U, Grenzebach UH, Busse H. Examination of Preschool Children for Ametropia: first experiences using a new hand-held autorefractor. Strabismus 2004; 12:111-7.
  4. Harvey EM, Miller JM, Dobson V, Tyszko R, Davis AL. Measurement of Refractive Error in Native American Preschoolers: Validity and Reproducibility of Autorefraction. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77:140-9.
  5. Adams RJ, Dalton SM, Murphy AM, Hall HL, Courage ML. Testing Young Infants with The Welch Allyn Suresight Non-cycloplegic Autorefractor. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22:546-51.
  6. Chen J, Xie AL, Hou LJ, Su Y, Lu F, Thorn F. Cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refractions of Chinese neonatal infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:2456–61.
  7. Kuo A, Sinatra RB, Donahue SP. Distribution of Refractive Error in Healthy Infants. J AAPOS 2003; 7:174-7.
  8. Varghese RM, Sreenivas V, Puliyel JM, Varughese S. Refractive Status at Birth: Its Relation to Newborn Physical Parameters at Birth and Gestational Age. PLoS One 2009;4: e4469.
  9. Cook A, White S, Batterbury M, Clark D. Ocular Growth and Refractive Error Development in Premature Infants Without Retinopathy of Prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44:953-960.
  10. Zha Y, Zhu G, Zhuang J, Zheng H, Cai J, Feng W. Axial Length and Ocular Development of Premature Infants without ROP. J Ophthalmol 2017;2017:6823965.
  11. Varughese S, Varghese RM, Gupta N, Ojha R, Sreenivas V, et al. Refractive error at birth and its relation to gestational age. Curr Eye Res 2005;30:423–8.

How to cite

1.
Özülken K, Gokce SE. Refractive Screening of Turkish Term Infants with a Handheld Autorefractometer. Turk J Pediatr Dis [Internet]. 2020 Mar. 18 [cited 2025 Aug. 23];14(2):143-6. Available from: https://turkjpediatrdis.org/article/view/705